These are the basic responses to conflict: (in the book, they are graphed on a slope from one extreme to the other, which makes more sense)
Suicide -- Flight -- Denial (Escape)
Overlook -- Reconciliation -- Negotiation -- Mediation -- Arbitration -- Accountability (Peacemaking)
Assault -- Litigation -- Murder (Attack)
I definitely tend toward the escape responses. When something goes wrong in friendships or family relationships and I don't see any simple way to resolve the conflict, then I want OUT as quickly as possible! Often, I feel panicked and sick, and I want to move. Texas, Colorado, London, I don't care - just as long as I can make a fresh start that is conflict free. It's irrational, yes, but it is where my mind goes first during any major problem or emotional pain. And in the most extreme pain I've dealt with, my thoughts went to the most extreme escape response - not a heatlhy place to be. Even in situations that others would consider minor, my oversensitive relationship-oriented personality can blow it out of proportion. I hate it when I feel so fragile and alone - and often like such a pushover, so I do what I can to stop thinking about it... I'm certain that this is where my daydreaming and emotional eating come from - a sort of numbed out mini-escape. "I have to be done" - I've heard myself say that a lot, but in the end, for me, that is as unrealistic as moving to a new state, so I typically end up turning toward a healthier response. I'm going to work on getting there faster, though. On trusting God more and making it my goal to honor Him rather than to escape the hard things life throws at me. People are not perfect, myself included (obviously), so I'm praying for wisdom and grace in this area. And I'm looking forward to reading more of this book... and hopefully learning how to keep healthy peace without being a pushover who silences herself for the good of others.
"When I resort to an escape response, I am generally focusing on 'me.' I am looking for what is easy, convenient, or nonthreatening for myself. When I use an attack response, I am generally focusing on 'you,' blaming you and expecting you to give in and solve the problem. When I use a peacemaking response, my focus is on 'us.' I am aware of everyone's interests in the dispute, especially God's, and I am working toward mutual responsibility in solving a problem...
People who use escape responses are usually intent on 'peace-faking,' or making things look good even when they are not. (This is especially common in the church, where people are often more concerned about the appearance of peace than the reality of peace.) Attack responses are used by people who are prone to 'peace-breaking.' They are more than willing to sacrifice peace and unity to get what they want. Those who use the responses on the top of the slippery slope are committed to 'peace-making' and will work long and hard to achieve true justice and genuine harmony with others."
~Ken Sande, The Peacemaker
